.png)
Your insurance company loses money every year because of operational inefficiencies. Manual processes create bottlenecks. Outdated systems cannot meet modern demands. Think about the direct financial hit: insurers could potentially reduce operational costs by 20-30% using targeted digital solutions. When your insurance operations depend on paper-based workflows, you face real consequences. Claims processing time drags on. Customer satisfaction plummets. Your competitors gain a competitive edge.
Manual claims processing causes multiple pain points across the customer journey. Your employees spend hours on data entry instead of focusing on revenue generating activities. Data errors happen more often. These errors require expensive corrections and create regulatory compliance risks. Insurance professionals often wrestle with fragmented information spread across disconnected systems. This makes it hard to gain deeper insights into customer behavior or risk patterns. You need access to relevant data quickly.
The impact goes beyond direct operational costs. Poor customer experiences drive away existing customers and damage your reputation. One unhappy customer shares their negative experience, multiplying the harm. Digital transformation provides a clear way forward. You can streamline operations and improve the customer experience. It's time to embrace digital transformation and leave inefficient methods behind. Failing to adapt means falling behind competitors who stay competitive by adopting new technologies.
The real cost of insurance operational inefficiencies
We took a wild (but educated guess) on the total cost of inefficiencies in insurance industry all over the world, and it's a staggering $2.74 trillion.
Direct Costs ($1.68 trillion)
Indirect Costs ($1.06 trillion)
- Customer Dissatisfaction Impact: $252.70 billion.
- Lost Revenue: $336.94 billion.
- Market Maturity Adjustment: $168.47 billion.
- Health Insurance Inefficiencies: $300.00 billion.
Policy Management ($839.31B)
- Operating expenses consume 25% of premium dollars
- 80% of agencies affected by manual processes
- Only 16% of carriers have fully integrated policy servicing
- Breakdown:
- Manual process inefficiencies: $249.30B
- Integration inefficiencies: $174.51B
- Excess operating costs: $415.50B
Legacy Systems ($286.55B)
- 70% of IT budgets spent on maintaining legacy systems
- 41% higher IT costs per policy on legacy platforms
- Components:
- Legacy maintenance: $174.51B
- Excess policy IT costs: $68.14B
- Integration inefficiencies: $37.40B
- Product launch costs: $6.50B
Claims Management ($139.93B)
- Claims leakage: $120B annually
- Delayed processing costs: $18.90B
- Manual claim creation costs: $1.03B
- 82% of claims take over 30 days to process
Underwriting ($138.13B)
- 41-43% of time spent on administrative tasks
- 3 hours daily spent on manual data entry
- Components:
- Administrative time waste: $27.30B
- Manual data entry: $24.38B
- Product launch delays: $18.75B
- Review cycle inefficiencies: $67.71B
Compliance ($280.76B)
- Base compliance costs: $181.00B
- HR integration inefficiencies: $49.86B
- Finance integration inefficiencies: $49.86B
- Manual process costs: $0.04B.
This is a rough estimate.
But here's what we know for sure based on data.
Operational Inefficiencies in Insurance Policy Management
Operating expenses consume 25% of every premium dollar, a ratio that has remained steady for at least a decade.
94% of insurance carriers report they are actively working to improve operational efficiency, yet 55% admit they are behind their targets for efficiency improvements.
Over 80% of insurance agencies face slow manual processes, leading to lost revenue and customer dissatisfaction.
Only 16% of carriers report full integration in policy servicing, and 19% in claims. Human resources and finance functions fare worse, with 30% and 20% respectively reporting a complete lack of integration.
Operational Inefficiencies in Claims Management
Insurers typically pay out 65–70% of total premiums in claims. Average value leakage (the gap between what should have been paid and what was actually paid) is 8–10% for casualty and motor insurance claims and 6–9% for property claims. Best-in-class insurers reduce this leakage to 4–7%.
What is the total global cost of leakage? Assuming the actual number is 8% and knowing that global compensation volume is $1.5 trillion, that's $120 billion wasted.
Five Sigma reports that:
- 82% of insurance executives say it takes their company more than 30 days to close a physical damage claim, highlighting significant delays in claims processing.
- 90% of respondents report that loss takers spend at least 11 minutes to create a new claim, a process that could be largely automated.
- Only 38% of insurers use software to automatically assign claims to adjusters, and just 16% have automated coverage opening and reserve setting, indicating low automation adoption.
Operational Inefficiencies in Insurance Underwriting
Underwriters spend 41–43% of their time on administrative tasks, while only about 33% is spent on core underwriting activities and 26% on sales enablement. 54% of insurance executives cite insufficient access to data, 51% point to legacy systems, and 47% mention a lack of skilled talent as top underwriting challenges.
On average, underwriters spend 3 hours per day on manual data entry instead of higher-value risk assessment. The peer review process for underwriting decisions takes 10 days on average, and the typical cycle from submission to quote is 8 days, with another 12 days from quote to bind.
Insurers typically require 12–18 months to create a new product and 3–6 months to modify existing coverage, slowing time-to-market and innovation.
Operational Inefficiencies in Insurance Due to Legacy Systems
Insurers allocate about 70% of their IT budgets to maintaining outdated legacy systems, leaving little for innovation or modernization.
IT costs per policy are, on average, 41% higher when managed on legacy platforms compared to modern systems, significantly impacting profitability and efficiency.
Launching a new insurance product on legacy systems typically takes 6–9 months and costs between $400,000 and $900,000 per product, largely due to manual configurations and lack of automation.
41% of insurance CIOs report that legacy systems are the primary obstacle to achieving technology success and operational efficiency.
Despite the inefficiencies, just 10% of large insurance providers have modernized more than half of their core systems, indicating widespread reliance on outdated infrastructure.
Operational Inefficiencies in Insurance Compliance
Compliance costs have surged, with financial institutions globally spending about $181 billion annually to maintain financial crime compliance. For large firms, the average compliance cost is about $10,000 per employee, and 50% of surveyed organizations spend 6–10% of their income on compliance.
Since the 2008 financial crisis, operating costs for compliance in retail and corporate banks have increased by 60%.
A single-entity insurance company operating in one state must manage 2,236 unique compliance requirements; when factoring in frequency, this rises to 4,638 compliance actions per year.
Only 19% of carriers have fully integrated claims systems, and just 16% have fully integrated policy servicing systems.
A majority of insurers report only limited integration across compliance-related functions, with more than two-thirds characterizing their systems as either lacking integration or having only limited integration with other systems. For example, 30% of HR and 20% of finance functions report a complete lack of integration.
While 81% of insurers have implemented some form of automation in their operations, integration with legacy systems remains a near-universal challenge, limiting the effectiveness of compliance automation.
Other Areas of Inefficiencies in Insurance
In the U.S. commercial health insurance sector, 33.5 cents of every dollar paid in claims is spent on administration, marketing, and overhead—over 14 times higher than the Medicare system and 11 times higher than the Canadian system.
Process automation: From manual tasks to intelligent flows
Transform your manual insurance tasks into automated, intelligent workflows. You will see immediate benefits. Eliminate repetitive tasks like data entry. Reduce errors. Free your employees for higher-value work that requires human judgment. This shift directly contributes to employee productivity and cost savings.
Basic process automation has evolved. Modern solutions now use artificial intelligence to create genuinely smart workflows. These systems do more than follow preset paths—they learn and adapt using data patterns. Implement robotic process automation (RPA) to handle routine tasks. Think document classification and data extraction. RPA bots process information 24/7 without fatigue or mistakes. They complete tasks in seconds that take human operators minutes or hours. Automation helps streamline processes effectively.
Insurance companies automating how they process claims report significant cost savings and shorter cycle times. A claim that once took days might now finish in hours, sometimes minutes. Customers get faster responses. This helps improve customer satisfaction and customer retention.
Focus automation efforts on these high-impact areas:
- Claims intake and initial assessment.
- Policy administration and renewals.
- Customer data management and updates.
- Regulatory compliance documentation.
Train employees during automation rollouts. Technology works best when people understand how to use it effectively. Create clear guidelines for handling exceptions—those unusual cases flagged by automated systems that need a human touch. Address your existing processes with a plan for continuous improvement.
Analytics platforms and AI for smarter operations
Data analytics changes insurance operations. It reveals hidden patterns and opportunities within your data. You get actionable information from the massive amounts of customer data your company already holds. Customer behaviors become more predictable. Risk assessment gets sharper. Yet, only 27% of insurers currently have advanced predictive modeling capabilities. There's room for growth here.
Machine learning algorithms analyze claims data. They identify potentially fraudulent claims with high precision. These systems spot suspicious patterns humans might miss. They constantly improve detection by learning from new cases. Predictive models can reduce fraud losses by as much as 40%.
Insurers using data analytics benefit from:
- Reduced rates of fraudulent claims.
- More accurate pricing models.
- Better customer segmentation for targeted marketing.
- Improved risk assessment accuracy by up to 60%.
Use AI-powered chatbots for routine customer inquiries. These digital tools give instant responses 24/7. They handle simple questions automatically, freeing human agents for complex issues. Artificial intelligence is becoming central; 42% of insurers are already investing in Generative AI, with 57% more planning to do so.
Mobile apps connected to your analytics platforms offer customers convenient self-service. People check policy details, submit claims, and track progress on their phones. Every interaction generates valuable data, feeding back into your systems for continuous improvement and helping you identify patterns.
Rule-based decisioning
Business Rules Engines (BREs) automate complex decision-making in insurance operations. Implement consistent decision logic across all transactions. Adapt quickly to regulatory changes. Maintain regulatory compliance while boosting operational speed.
Modern solutions like BREs separate decision logic from application code. Business users can modify rules without needing IT for every change. When regulations shift, update the rules swiftly without disrupting operations. This agility is necessary to stay competitive.
Apply rule-based decisioning to these insurance processes:
- Underwriting and policy issuance.
- Claims authorization and payment approval.
- Fraud detection rules.
- Compliance checks.
- Pricing decisions.
- Product configuration.
BREs allow for rapid product adjustments, reducing time-to-market and potentially opening new avenues for revenue growth. They help manage the customer journey by ensuring consistent application of rules.
Key Finding: Integrating BREs can lead to substantial cost savings and improved employee productivity by automating standard decisions and reducing manual checks.
Connect BREs with your data analytics platform for data-driven decisions. Link them to process automation systems for end-to-end intelligent workflows. This integration helps improve customer retention by speeding up interactions and ensuring fairness.
Integrating disconnected systems
Insurance operations often struggle with disconnected legacy systems. These outdated systems don't communicate well. You waste time manually transferring data between platforms. You create data inconsistencies. You miss chances to get a complete view of your customers from customer relationship management (CRM) systems and other sources. Only 16% of insurers report mature capabilities in using digital twins, often hampered by system fragmentation 4.
API-based integration offers a flexible way to connect different systems. Modern APIs allow secure, standard data exchange while preserving each system's integrity. This avoids the high cost of replacing entire systems. You can embrace digital transformation incrementally.
Enterprise Service Buses (ESBs) act as a communication layer. They translate data formats and manage message routing. ESBs help preserve investments in specialized legacy systems while adding modern integration capabilities. Consider data lakes to consolidate information from multiple sources. Analytics tools access this unified store for comprehensive insights. You keep separate operational systems but gain the benefits of integrated data analysis.
Successfully integrate your systems strategically:
- Map current system capabilities and limitations. Identify areas needing connection.
- Pinpoint integration points affecting the customer experience.
- Prioritize integration based on business impact and potential cost savings.
- Implement modular innovative solutions for incremental improvements.
Connecting systems allows insurance professionals to access unified customer data, leading to better service and informed decisions for the insurance business.
Technological solutions and their impact on reducing inefficiencies
Here's a summary of how different technologies tackle inefficiencies, along with potential impact metrics:
Key Takeaway: Implementing these new technologies strategically allows your insurance business to reduce operational costs, improve customer satisfaction, and gain a competitive advantage. The metrics show clear benefits across various insurance operations.
Embrace digital transformation and gain competitive edge with Business Rules Engine
You've seen how technology addresses major pain points in insurance operations. Automation cuts down repetitive tasks. AI and analytics provide insights to combat fraudulent claims and understand customer data better. Business Rules Engines ensure consistent, compliant decision-making. Integrating disconnected systems provides a unified view, improving both employee productivity and the customer journey.
Don't wait for competitors to pull further ahead. Embrace digital transformation to achieve significant cost savings and improve customer retention. Assess your current processes, identify areas for improvement, and implement new technologies strategically. Focus on continuous improvement to stay competitive.
Ready to take the next step? Contact our content strategy team. Our experts provide detailed training and support to help your teams implement these innovative solutions and optimize your insurance business for the future. Let's build more efficient and customer-centric insurance operations together.
---------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2019/03/operational-excellence-report-2019.pdf
https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2019/03/operational-excellence-report-2019.pdf
https://www.iii.org/sites/default/files/docs/pdf/insurance-driver-econ-growth-053018.pdf
https://fivesigmalabs.com/news/claims-performance-benchmarks-new-study/
https://riskandinsurance.com/pc-insurance-grapples-with-rising-risks-operational-challenges-report/
https://www.hyperexponential.com/blog/why-underwriting-inefficiency-is-holding-back-performance-and-profitability/
https://www.unqork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/the-5-underwriting-challenges-holding-p-c-carriers-back.pdf
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60a7c08679f96a2e7c9ef585121532471dabd4c7
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60a7c08679f96a2e7c9ef585121532471dabd4c7
https://openkoda.com/insurance-legacy-systems-modernization/